Is this really happening? I have no doubt that, if Clint is hearing it, people at Warner Bros are discussing it. That doesn’t mean they’re discussing it seriously, or that it will come to pass, but I do believe that this is an option on the table for the folks at WB.
And it’s a good option. If I was them it’s the option I’d take. First of all, Bryan Singer’s running off to do another thriller for United Artists. Great move for him as an artist, but it could be delaying Superman: The Man of Steel (despite what the people at the Superman Home Page tell you, you never want your director going off to another project before he starts your project. It’s just too risky). With Superman Returns failing to use its heat vision to light the box office on fire, the studio is surely skittish about the expensive sequel, and without the ‘auteur’ of the last one things look a little more shaky.
Meanwhile, the studio has begun developing a Justice League movie, but no one knew whether or not Superman would be involved. A JL movie is great for WB because they have all these lame, third tier superheroes from whom they would like to earn movie franchise money, but unlike Marvel, they don’t seem to understand how to launch these nobodies. Putting a bunch of them together in a big film creates perfect spin-off serendipity. But of course there was the problem that with Superman and Batman in their own franchises, the Justice League was devoid of any name characters – so instead of a spin-off machine for third-tier characters, you have a movie stuffed to the gills with third-tier characters nobody cares about. Unless you can bring Brandon Routh as Superman in to anchor the whole thing.Think about it – why did Superman Returns not do that well? Because there’s no action. It’s a superhero movie in the old vein, the Richard Donner vein, when they couldn’t afford to do anything but pick heavy objects up. And that doesn’t cut it in the 21st century.
But that Superman character has name recognition, and if you put him in a movie with a bunch of other interesting looking characters and actually have them hit something/someone, you can get people into theaters.Again, this could all just be borne from some guys shooting the shit at Warner Bros, but as far as I’m concerned, if there’s ever going to be a sequel to Superman Returns, it has to happen after the character is rehabilitated in an exciting, action-packed film hat doesn’t center on him being mopey. That film – that multiple franchise starter – would be a Justice League movie.
5 comments:
Man, I LOVE that picture! Captain Marvel being goofy in the background, the dumpy Riddler...it's classic.
This continues to sound like an unlikely move to me, both making a JLA flick and sidelining Superman for it, but I'm down.
The best thing about the Justice League is the sound of the two words together: "Justice League."
I remember the first time I saw the cover of an issue of WATCHMEN and I got the same goosebumps, mostly because of the missing "THE."
Removing the "The" is a tricky business. It's totally overdone in the movie Titanic ("Are you ready to go back to Titanic?"). In the seventies they tried very hard to put the "The" BACK IN with Batman. Suddenly it's "The Batman" all over the place. I don't know.
But I hope they call the movie Justice League (no "The") because it sounds so badass. MUCH better than "The Avengers" or "The Fantastic Four." ("Did I mention how FANTASTIC they are? especially MISTER FANTASTIC!")
There's a Batman cartoon on the WB (either current or just recent, I'm not sure) that distinguishes itself from its predecessors by being The Batman. On the product packaging, the "the" is actually the upper hole on the B in Batman.
That's cool. In Moonraker Bond had a little sly camera that, when viewed head on, used the miniature lens and the rangefinder lens as the 0s in "007." It would have been cool if it wasn't effete, smirking Roger Moore.
spy camera
Post a Comment