Monday, June 05, 2006

Go Neo, go!

Speed Racing is about to get pseudo-philosophical! According to an informant for IGN, the Wachowski Brothers, made famous for their Matrix Trilogy, may next take-on a live-action adaptation of the anime series Speed Racer.

From Iwatchstuff, "Larry and Andy Wachowski, the creative force behind The Matrix trilogy, may write and direct the live-action, feature film version of Speed Racer for Joel Silver Pictures and Warner Bros...None of the parties involved would go on the record when asked about the project.
Fans of the series know that Speed Racer founded the "bullet time" effect used so heavily in The Matrix series when Speed first froze at the end of the series' title sequence and the camera spun around him. With these two bullet time legends in bed together, I can only imagine what will result. It will probably take two hours to cover four minutes of events, but it won't matter with how sweet that shit is.

It still remains unclear how a Wachowski Brothers take on the quirky series would differ from the original. I fully expect Speed's famous red ascot to be made of shiny black leather."

Fantastic Four: The Next Chapter

Yep, that's the title of the forthcoming FF sequel. It reminds me of those white cereal boxes in the supermarket that just say "cereal" on them.

Nicolas Cage on Ghost Rider

From Coming soon: 'While on the set of his new film Next, Nicolas Cage spilled some secrets about why the much anticipated comic book movie Ghost Rider was postponed and talked about his plans to direct again.

ComingSoon.net hung out with the eclectic actor for a day and learned that, although there were some reshoots in the last few weeks for Ghost Rider, it's now complete and Cage is finished with the project.

"They were just tweaking certain things towards the end," he explained. "The reason the movie was delayed, I know that's been on people's minds. There were some effects that finally got authorized by the studio which [writer-director] Mark [Steven Johnson] really wanted and they're pretty big and it took time to put them together and design them. So we had to delay it and I think it's good because it's something we really wanted to fight for with Ghost Rider going into battle with a helicopter."

Cage, who is a big comic book fan, is really excited about the movie and said he thinks the audience will love his character.

"I mean, of all the characters I feel like that's the one we haven't seen anything quite like yet. It's new terrority because it deals with the spiritual as well as the physical world and that's pretty complex stuff for a comic book character. Also he's a lot of fun. The character of Johnny Blaze, the way we've kind of all designed him, he's a fun character. I wanted to bring a little humor to it as well."

As for a sequel, don't expect him to be in one if there is another one, or any sequel for that matter.

"I'm not contractually obligated to sequels on anything. I'll never say never, but I am happy that I haven't made any sequels to this point. If I do do a sequel, I'm going to have to know for sure that the script is better than the original. So I'm going to be very careful about that because I'm not eager to repeat myself."

And while Cage may only have one film (Sonny) under his belt for directing, he's excited to play that role again.

"I'm happy with the way my directorial debut has been received over time. At first, because of the subject matter being pretty taboo, I don't think people understood and that's OK. It's interesting, I just talked to James Franco this morning. We're both kind of happy with the different responses we've received because of it's life on cable television and DVD so I thought wouldn't it be great to do something together again, so I'm actively looking for something to work with James on."'

X3 drops 67%

By Scott Bowles, USA TODAY
LOS ANGELES — Once again, a break-up is doing wonders for Jennifer Aniston's career.
Her high profile divorce from Brad Pitt made her a staple of the tabloid and talk show circuit. Now her movie The Break-Up has put her at the top of the box office this weekend.

The comedy with Vince Vaughn raked in $38.1 million, according to studio estimates.The haul is $10 million more than analysts predicted and was the third highest debut for a romantic comedy, behind only Hitch's $43.1 million opener and 50 First Dates' debut of $39.3 million.

Despite some tough reviews — only a third of the nation's film critics gave the movie a thumbs-up, according to rottentomatoes.com — the debut puts Aniston back among A-list actresses after some flops like last year's Derailed and Rumor Has It.

The movie was likely helped by interest in the reported relationship between Aniston and Vaughn, analysts say. Though neither has confirmed the relationship, the stars probably benefited "from interest about their chemistry," says Bradley Jacobs, a senior editor for US Weekly.

"I think people want to see the chemistry on screen in the same way people wanted to see the chemistry (between Pitt and Angelina Jolie) in Mr. And Mrs. Smith," he says of last year's action thriller that did $186.3 million.

Her next career move, analysts say, should be to continue moving away from her beloved character Rachel Green from the Friends television series.

"It's hard to transfrom from small screen stardom to the big screen," says Jess Cagle, an editor at large for People magazine. "But she's a really, really good actress. There's no question she's got the chops."

Cagle says that Aniston would be well served to avoid the girl-next-door roles that made her so popular on Friends and gravitate toward deeper character examinations, such as The Good Girl and Friends with Money. Both movies were moderate box office successes but won her high praise from critics.

"Once audiences forget about Rachel Green, she can graduate to the bigger stuff," Cagle says.

Few other films made a ripple this weekend. X-Men: The Last Stand dropped a sizeable 67% from its debut to take second place and $34.4 million.

Over the Hedge was third with $20.6 million, followed by The Da Vinci Code with $19.3 million. Mission: Impossible 3 was fifth with $4.7 million.An Inconvenient Truth, Al Gore's documentary on global warming, took in $1.3 million only only 77 screens.

It's official, a Zombie for Halloween

From Hollywood reporter, "Zombie plots new mayhem for 'Halloween'

Rob Zombie is resurrecting Michael Myers, one of the big screen's favorite horror villains. Zombie will write and direct a new "Halloween" movie, serving up what is being called as a brand-new vision for the long-running horror series. Malek Akkad of Trancas International Films will produce the feature along with Andy Gould of Vision Entertainment Group. Zombie also will serve as a producer and a music supervisor on the film. Miramax Films will co-finance the development with Dimension Films. The movie will not be a sequel or a straight-ahead remake of the original -- which helped director John Carpenter cement his name in the horror biz -- but a reimagining that will infuse new blood into the Myers story."

Friday, June 02, 2006

Rob Zombie takes on Michael Myers?

From the Horrorchannel, "It's not confirmed as of yet, but it sure does make a lot of sense...

For months now it’s been rumored that Rob Zombie’s next film would be a big one, and I guess they don’t get much bigger than that Halloween franchise, do they? Fangoria is reporting today that, according to rumors around Tineseltown, Zombie is preparing to sign on to direct the 9th Halloween movie.

As we told you about here, the film in development won’t be working from the "Lost Years" scenario rumored in the past, but it will take place at Smith’s Grove Sanitarium, where Michael spent most of his formative years. It’s been confirmed by all sources close to the franchise that the next director will be a big name, and Zombie’s is the one that really makes the most sense.

The question is can he handle it? He showed a lot less spastic camera and editing with The Devil's Rejects, but has yet to prove he can tackle something that would require as much atmosphere as a well-made Halloween movie needs. Of course, since there hasn’t been a well-made Halloween movie in decades, maybe it is time to try something new.

Hopefully confirmation will come shortly of this potentially very cool news. Stay tuned!"

Thursday, June 01, 2006

More help on that pesky teenager problem


Here's a teaser poster for Simon Says, "a horror film that deals with a group of beautiful teenagers who are isolated and killed off one by one." And to that I can only say: finally!

It looks like the bad guy in this movie is Sweetums from the Muppet Show, who should know that the proper way to drag a corpse with a pickaxe is to hook it under the jaw, not the ribcage. What are they teaching these deformed hillbillies nowadays?

Alba Spills On "Fantastic" Sequel


USA Today spoke with 2006 MTV Movie Awards host Jessica Alba recently, and she confirmed some rumours that had been swirling regarding the "Fantastic Four" sequel:

"We start 'Fantastic Four 2' in August. The four of us learn that there are other people out there with superpowers, and the Silver Surfer appears as a villain/hero. And another villain comes in as well. My character, Susan Storm, has another love triangle and may use a power people haven't seen before. She's the most powerful of the four" says Alba.

A June 15th 2007 release date has been targeted.

666 sucks?


From Darkhorizons, "The first time I heard they were remaking "The Omen" I had to ask...'why?'. Having seen the remake, I'm still left with the same question. Time has been kind to Richard Donner's original 1976 effort, the thriller having earned itself a solid notch on the belt of the supernatural horror genre. Yet many seem to forget that upon its initial release, "The Omen" was essentially seen as a pale imitator of masterpieces like "The Exorcist" and "Rosemary's Baby" which had both opened to great success before it.

Rewatching it again the other week, the film holds up better than many of the other efforts in the genre that still get churned out today. Even more surprisingly it yielded a half-decent initial sequel. Still, it remains the somewhat disappointing sister when compared to those other two benchmarks of the genre, and is ultimately a flawed but still highly effective bit of work.

This remake on the other hand isn't a masterpiece, the complete opposite in fact. The whole point of a remake is to either improve upon a flawed film, or to bring a new and/or different perspective to a classic tale. 'Omen' does neither, rather its more like Gus Van Sant's "Psycho" - essentially a shot for shot remake of the original, but with weaker performances and more deliberate 'jump scares' to get the teen girls screaming and gripping their boyfriends in fear.

In many ways it's disturbing how much Director John Moore has adhered to the original film, so much so that those familiar with it in any way will very quickly get irritated or bored with this rehash. Even those new to the tale will find its now somewhat dated material and the inherent flaws from the original still visible, despite various attempts to hide them by 'jazzing up' the horror quotient.

How did this happen? Moore is partly responsible, but I'm sure Fox pressuring him to hit the target release date has not helped. The pair first worked on the odious "Behind Enemy Lines" in 2001, a film best described as the cinematic equivalent of some drunk taking a dump on the tomb of the unknown soldier. Their second was 2004's "Flight of the Phoenix", a remake of a classic 1960's adventure film. That however was a movie that has been practically forgotten by modern culture, so Moore had much greater freedom with his characters and story. He ended up delivering a lightly entertaining but forgettable action vehicle that was loyal to the original film but not to the point of it being a crux.

With "The Omen" however, he's much more mindful of the original's impact on its audience and so almost never strays from it. The script has had maybe five of its dialogue changed, that's it. Even very minor scenes are not only in the same style settings, but shot and lit in ways that are the same or on a ridiculously bigger scale that screams Hollywood interference. They've kept it so close to the material that even many of the original film's flaws - the endless reciting of the poem, the reason behind the priest's thigh birthmark, etc. still pop up with no explanation.

With so much used from the original, the filmmakers have mishandled the four things which still resonate from it today - the deaths, the tone, the performances and the music. The most immediately noticable difference is the music. Jerry Goldsmith's original theme with its chilling Latin choir chants immediately unsettled you, whilst the incidental music cleverly added atmosphere to an assortment of scenes ranging from the creepy dogs to the shocking deaths. Marco Beltrami's redux of Goldsmith's work is a wash, forgettable white noise I can't recall a single note of now - just 24 hours after I saw it.

Also, right from the start you'll notice the film's very minor cosmetic changes to make it more contemporary. There's a vague bit at the start and end where high members of the Vatican are talking about these coming events to an ailing Pope. In one rather surprising scene they link recent tragedies such as 9/11, the Challenger disaster and the South-East Asian tsunami to the prophecies in Revelations about the coming of the Anti-Christ. . Yet that one bit, along with an extra death to make Schrieber's new occupation more credible, are the only true moments of new material here.

The other scenes play out like before but Moore ditches the old film's well-timed suspenseful build-ups in favour of extraordinary loud jump shocks. For example, instead of the dogs slowly amassing above the cemetery and adding a growing sense of dread to that sequence, they just suddenly appear. The wife has several prophetic nightmares full of horror imagery, and yet none of it is as memorable as that dizzying shot in the original of the evil nanny staring as Damien rides his tricycle around the camera. Even the deaths are 'spruced up' and in doing so take away from their simplistic horror.

The "Omen" movies in many ways were precursors to the "Final Destination" films - the series was notable for all its deaths being somewhat gruesome accidents in which an invisible hand seems to play a part. Here they essentially keep all but one of the deaths done like the original movie but make some cosmetic changes. Someone doesn't just get speared, they get speared and rained on with broken glass for example. In another, someone doesn't just fall from a first storey staircase, rather they fall from a second storey one. Funnily enough the original's most famous death is the only one that gets a pretty decent and different reinterpretation, but its not enough justification for a whole new film.

The performances are the final and biggest nail in the coffin though. Whilst Schrieber and Stiles are both too young to be in the position they're in, both are proven actors who could make it believable - and yet neither really seems to try. Stiles comes off the better of the two, and adds some more maternal qualities that were missing from Lee Remick's original turn, but fails to pull off her character's slowly slipping away sanity as effectively.

Schrieber however seems to be sleepwalking through his role, displaying none of the compelling depth he's shown with other films including recent remakes like "The Manchurian Candidate". So, when the final horrific decision has to be made, you simply don't feel or empathise with the hesistancy and outrage that you should be feeling. Gregory Peck, admittedly a little too old for the part when he played it, nevertheless was able to convey the emotions far more effectively.

Not helping is the kid who's creepy and seems to be aware that he is, right from the outset. It undermines the film as you sort of want this kid to die right from the get go, unlike the chubby little boy from the original who at least seemed like he hadn't escaped from wherever they kept "The Boys from Brazil" locked up. Then comes the smaller stunt casting roles - Mia Farrow as an evil nanny sounds great on paper but she's blander than bran, lacking that icy sinister edge required, so her final homicidal tantrum proves laughable more than anything else.

Great thesps such as Michael Gambon and Pete Postlethwaite have minor roles as priests, and both fail to bring that dark edge and sense of desperation that Leo McKern and Patrick Troughton were able to imbue in their roles in the original. Only David Thewlis, taking over the great David Warner's shoes as the paparazzi photographer who helps Schrieber, manages to at least feel like he's giving a half decent performance on his own terms.

Ultimately pointless, the remake of "The Omen" is exactly as it appears - a marketing ploy to exploit the admittedly intriguing release date gimmick. There is absolutely nothing new here, nothing to justify why it was made and nothing of redeeming value short of a few (and admittedly effective) jumps that work more because of loud music blaring rather than actual scares. Some of the shots are grander, some of the deaths more elaborate, but it comes at the cost of any real sense of atmosphere, emotion or suspense. The only evil going on here is the two hours you'll waste watching it. - Garth Franklin"

Arad Talks The Future Of "X-Men"


From Darkhorizons, 'Marvel Studios CEO Avi Arad has left his job this week to run his own production company, and iF Magazine caught up with him yesterday just before the announcement to talk about the future of the "X-Men" franchise.

First up, "Wolverine" - is it a prequel or sequel? "I don't want to call it a prequel nor a sequel. It is Wolverine's story and it is really concentrating on him. It's about his life, his mysteries, and his loves. It's not really a prequel or a sequel. It's just a story like in the comics where we have X-Men, Wolverine, and books dealing with the other X-Men".

"Magneto" is still in the works and will span many years of the character's life. And a fourth "X-Men"? "There's always a chance of an X-MEN sequel. It's more of an issue of what is the next X-Men story, and when to do it. There are an endless amount of stories and great sagas that can go into the future, the past, and the present. There are so many more characters that we didn't deal with yet. I would not preclude anything".

Finally, he confirmed that whilst they didn't cut anything from the film for time, they did have "things that we did specifically for the DVD" and said "Absolutely" to the chances of an extended edition DVD.

How Arad's new arrangements will affect his involvement is unsure right now, though he's still attached to produce projects like "Hulk 2" and "Iron Man".'

Samples From John Ottman's SUPERMAN RETURNS Score Now On-line


On the heels of yesterday's soundtrack dicussion comes some samples from John Ottman’s SUPERMAN RETURNS score. Go here and decide if he's up to the challenge.

Salem's Lot 1979 and Salem's Lot 2024

Happy Halloween everybody! Julie's working late and the boy doesn't have school tomorrow so he's heading to one of those crazy f...