First rule of Horrorthon is: watch horror movies. Second rule of Horrorthon is: write about it. Warn us. Tempt us. The one who watches the most movies in 31 days wins. There is no prize.
Thursday, October 08, 2009
The Strangers
(2008) ****
The Strangers is on the opposite end of the horror spectrum from Hostel. It’s pure atmosphere, pure style. As I wrote below, a movie like Hostel works on multiple levels, employing complex storytelling techniques to convey political and philosophical overtones (in the great tradition of Halloween and Dawn of the Dead). The Strangers isn’t interested in any of that. It’s all about wind chimes, and neo-Ridley Scott handheld photography, and little indoor breezes that make the candles flicker. This is the kind of movie in which the characters decide to put some music on and you’re not remotely surprised that they’re playing vintage piano blues…on a phonograph.
The Strangers has exactly as much plot as it needs (i.e. barely any) and not a stroke more. The story is so sparse, it actually flirts with the kind of surrealism practiced by Polanski and Lynch and Antonioni; any less of an explanation of what you’re watching, and you’d be too baffled to follow the sequences and you’d have to classify it as an “art film.” By means of a rudimentary – but very effective – framing device (involving a pair of young quasi-Jehovah’s Witnessess on bicycles) we’re deprived early on of much hope of a happy ending; even the basic elements of surprise are essentially stripped away. But this skeletal narrative framework is filled with so much sensual texture and so many artfully evocative touches that it’s every bit as gripping and frightening as it would be if you had been provided with reams of exposition (if not more so). I mentioned the miniature Jehovah’s Witnesses on Schwinn bicycles who open the movie: Why are they Jehovah’s Witnesses, exactly? If you want a reasonable answer, you’ll have to get over it. Because it looks good, and suits the odd, off-kilter tone that the movie sustains so masterfully. (Just like the vinyl record, which is, of course, warped and scratched.)
This is, obviously, an extremely difficult game for filmmakers to play (judging by the failure rate); most of the points I’ve made above could easily be employed as criticisms rather than plaudits (and, of course, have been by the movie’s detractors), so I have to give the writer/director (Bryan Bertino, making his debut) tremendous credit for not hedging his bets; for having the courage to strip nearly everything away and be assured that he’d still have a movie. Like Night of the Living Dead, The Strangers focuses completely on a few characters in a remote house over the course of a single night, increasingly aware that a grave threat is outside, trying to get in…but Night of the Living Dead is Dr. Zhivago by comparison. This time, there are only two protagonists: estranged couple Liv Tyler and Scott Speedman (who’s from that breed of interchangeably affable, reasonably talented male actors you find in horror movies with female protagonists, like the boyfriend in The Ring), whose reasons for being alone in this lonely house on this particular evening are (again) barely provided. The threat beyond the walls – the strangers who seem able to find their way inside despite Tyler’s and Speedman’s increasingly desperate efforts to keep them out – are so elemental and yet so mundane in their fearsomeness that none of the standard movie responses seem to apply. The plot never thickens, or provides any twists, but it doesn’t matter: it never even occurs to you that you’ve seen these narrative moves before.
So why not five stars? Only because the movie ultimately plays its cards a bit too close to the vest; Bertino isn’t quite the visual/auditory genius he would need to be to pull off this parlor trick completely. (But it’s his first movie!) The Strangers was a surprise hit, and there’s talk of a sequel (which may or may not be a good idea), which indicates its effectiveness in bravely sticking to its minimalist intentions and winning over the audience, not with ideas or innovations, but with pure skill. There’s not much to be said concerning what this movie’s “about” (again, in marked contrast to Hostel), but confounding the need to answer that question is among the noblest traditions in art (Ridley Scott famously bragged that Alien had “no theme and no meaning”). Ultimately, The Strangers is about the sound of crickets, outside the window…and the whisper of unease that accompanies that sound.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Salem's Lot 1979 and Salem's Lot 2024
Happy Halloween everybody! Julie's working late and the boy doesn't have school tomorrow so he's heading to one of those crazy f...
-
(2007) * First of all let me say that as far as I could tell there are absolutely no dead teenagers in this entire film. Every year just ...
15 comments:
Jordan one of your reviews is a welcomed read first thing in the morning.
If you haven't seen the movie, put your fingers over JSP's comment and leave them there.
Thanks, Catfreeek!
I deleted my comment because I think everyone on this blog should see The Strangers and I don't want to discourage anyone.
Yeah, that's probably for the best. Although the business about your disagreement with JPX was interesting.
I didn't see JSP's comments but almost wrote one myself and hesitated because it may have been a spoiler.
I realize that there is a clear reason for the young Jehovah's Witnesses: a single line of dialogue that would probably be impossible otherwise. But I stand by my points about the movie's intense minimalism.
You mean the last line of the movie?
There's a last line to the movie? D'oh! You ruined it!
This has been on my Must See list for a while, on the suggestion of a number of people (here and elsewhere). I'm even more intrigued after reading this review; I hadn't yet gotten a feel for the minimalist approach. Very interesting.
I liked this film a lot and I mostly agree with your review. I looked at my review from last year to remind myself of what bothered me about the story,
SPOILERS
First, the
characters just aren’t very likable. We never really get to know them
beyond a few flashbacks showcasing the breakup moment of their
relationship, and quite frankly, I thought Kristen was a jerk for
turning down James’ proposal. She never offered a convincing reason
why beyond, “I’m not ready”. Another problem is that it’s made clear
early on that the “Strangers” are real people yet they move in and out
of scenes with impossible stealth. You can’t walk across a large
wooden floor without making at least one creak! Also, there are a
number of cheap scares of the hand on the shoulder variety (e.g., “I
didn’t mean to scare you” - well don’t walk up to her and put your
hand on her shoulder while you’re dealing with three sociopaths!).
Finally, and this is a biggie, I just didn’t like one specific aspect
of the ending, which would spoil the film if I clarified. Suffice it
to say I didn’t derive any satisfaction from the climax (infuriated is
more like it) and felt cheated after such a perfect first act. Still,
one might argue that these complaints are minor compared to the
overall gestalt of the story. While these specific aspects of the film
detracted from my overall rating, The Strangers is a creepy story that
is very much worth your time.
*slaps head in disbelief*
What's interesting is that every one of your complaints corresponds directly to the points I made in praising the movie. Of course there's no sufficient explanation for their romantic estrangement; of course the scares are simple and cheap. I really did cover all of that.
Obviously these are subjective matters of taste; like I wrote in the review, people who don't like The Strangers are going to use the same points as the people who love it. It's a free country etc. But everything you're complaining about is a deliberate part of the weave of the movie, and therefore part of what I like about it.
Excellent review, Jordan!
JPX and I went back and forth on this film for a while after we watched it. I really enjoyed it for much of the same reasons as Jordan, and wasn’t bothered by the points JPX mentioned. JPX did watch it a second time, and I have been meaning to do the same.
Post a Comment