Thursday, March 29, 2007

Spider-Man 3 novel reviewed [non-spoiler]

From AICN, "Even allowing for the fact that this is a novelization - and so granted there's always going to be some expanding to get a 100 page screenplay into a 350 page book - but even allowing for that, Spider-Man 3 feels like a lot thrown in at once. Much like X3: The Last Stand, it feels like they took the two or three directions they liked the most and decided to go with all of them at the same time. Or maybe it's just that there's too many plot threads to wrap up, too many new characters introduced that don't get the development they deserve. Peter David seems to be Marvel's go-to guy for novelizations these days. With the Hulk, he made a dark and bewildering movie a little lighter and easier to understand, and with Fantastic Four he made a light and funny movie a little...lighter and funny. I don't know how much is David's work here and how much is the original screenplay, likewise I don't know how what's changed since the earlier draft that David most likely would have worked off of, so a bit of a warning before I get into the nitty. And this whole thing is going to be spoiler territory so let them avoid, that must."

Go here for minor spoilers: http://www.aintitcool.com/node/32082

1 comment:

Octopunk said...

Hey, I get that X3 had a lot of plot threads, but if this turns out anything like X3 we'll be in real good shape.

Just over a month! A month after that and we'll feel behind on summer flicks and a year later we'll be mentioning which ones we still haven't rented.

And I can't wait.

Malevolent

 2018  ***1/2 It's 1986 for some reason, and a team of paranormal investigators are making a big name for themselves all over Scotland. ...