Thanks to jpx and JSP I had the opportunity to select and critique my ten favorite original Star Trek episodes (posted here on Horrorthon). It was a surprisingly rewarding endeavor, since it forced me to document a few decades' worth of Trek thinking. While working on something else the last couple of days (involving a lot of coding) I decided to take my own advice and watch my ten faves, in the same broadcast-order I listed them.
All I can say is, JSP, you're in for quite an experience. (I'm actually envious; I would love to see TOS for the first time as an adult.) Coming back to this stuff, I'm consistently amazed at just how good it all is. Every one of these episodes has quite literally given me chills as I watched. (Right now, I'm three-quarters of the way through The City on the Edge of Forever, in which the contrasting portions written by Harlan Ellison and by Gene Roddenberry have an almost Lennon/McCartney counterpoise going on.) I think if one were to go back in time and tell the cast and crew of the show that they were launching a franchise that would lead to eleven feature films and five more television series and a permanent place in the world's popular culture, they would be stunned and baffled. I mean, these guys were eating lunch every day in the Paramount/Desilu cafeteria next to the cast of Bonanza; not exactly an environment for forging an immortal mythos on a Homeric scale. (The James Bond franchise is slightly older, with twice as many movies, but the pieces don't all fit together the same way and the whole thing is much less substantive.)
Original Trek is obviously great television (although its cinematic limitations are beginning to date badly; see my original remarks) and, as I've tried to suggest, great drama, but the show's achievements as science fiction are particularly remarkable. Watching today, in the iPhone/Obama era, I'm consistently struck by the deep intelligence underlying the show's concepts of future technology and society. Star Trek's understanding and presentation of computers and communication systems are astonishingly accurate and predictive, as is the multi-racial casting and the gender balance represented by Roddenberry's utopian starship crew. Remember that the Enterprise's voice-activated "library computer" was created by writers using manual typewriters who had probably never seen a real computer in their lives; similarly, the show's "communicators" (which are almost exactly like cell phones except that you hold them in front of your face instead of next to your ear; that's the only detail they got wrong) were invented in a time that pre-dated even personal paging devices by a decade, when a portable phone involved a heavy backpack and was only available to soldiers in combat. As David Gerrold (author of the beloved second season episode "The Trouble With Tribbles") wrote in 1973,
Star Trek is the visualization of such a basic concept that it is a whole genre of science fiction: the spaceship exploring new worlds. While Gene Roddenberry did not create the original concept, he fleshed it out so completely that all future motion picture or television attempts to explore this area will be forced to solve many of their problems the same way that Star Trek did. Just as it is impossible to write a science fiction story about robots without being aware of Isaac Asimov's massive body of work in the area, it will be impossible to do stories of interstellar explorers without recognition of the ground covered by Star Trek.
The idea of creating a full-fledged fictional universe spanning across multiple stories is older than written language, of course, but the scheme of using episodic television to do it was absolutely brand new, completely invented here. George Lucas instigated what may be regarded as a "counter-reformation" ten years later, throwing away the Trek earnestness and progressive values in exchange for a return to 1930s serial adventures; the subsequent sci-fi-movie frenzy was so overwhelming that it actually changed Trek, and all eleven movies and all the spinoff shows must be considered in light of the Lucas/Spielberg revolution. But the original show, captured in digital amber on DVD, is a one-of-a-kind achievement. As depression-era visionary Edith Keeler puts it (in The City on the Edge of Forever), "I don't pretend to tell you how to find happiness and love when every day is a struggle to survive, but I do insist that you do survive, because the days and the years ahead are worth living for." (No wonder Kirk fell for her.) Nobody had walked on the moon when Roddenberry sat down at his typewriter and started dreaming. Ten years later, Star Trek was long gone, seemingly never to return, but the first NASA space shuttle orbiter was named "Enterprise" in tribute to his dream.
6 comments:
As I was sitting here staring out the window looking at the snow fall on my car, which I just washed (of course), I thought, as I often do, "I wonder if there are any new comments on the blog?" How exciting it was to go to Horrorthon to find another Jordan essay, on a Saturday no less! I love all the participants on this blog, it makes work more exciting and I learn a lot from everyone.
Excellent essay, my friend. You have really helped me to appreciate Star Trek more than ever. I must confess, it's been a while since I've regularly watched Star Trek OS. For one thing, after all the other Trek shows and movies, I think I got a little burnt out on the franchise. Also, I'm probably the only person that doesn't have Tivo or the like, so I never know when Trek OS is on. For a while now i have intended to pick up the DVD sets but they're always crazy-expensive! The "remastered" episodes are apparently only going to be available for DVD if you purchase them on Blu-Ray. I'll be attending WonderCon in 2 weeks and I hope to score Star Trek OS there (God love the bootleggers!). I intend to watch the 10 episodes in the order that you listed.
Jordan, I'd love to see you do a Top 10 Worst episodes list some time. My list would probably consist of every episode where Wesley saved the crew or any story that featured Nelix!
Wonderful essay! I have never really been a huge Trek fan, but this new view makes me very interested in seeing the originals.
Thanks!
I don't have time to read this now but I'm really looking forward to it! Also, I watched/fucking-loved Miri last night.
YES! Delighted to hear it.
Thanks, jpx and dcd, for your kind remarks. My only disagreement would be to mention my dislike for the "special edition" versions, which bother me far more than the Star Wars special editions. As I've tried to demonstrate, the bad visuals are part of the fabric of what was achieved here; taking them away is like colorizing Chaplin.
Excellent words! The whole thing. I think it's funny that Gerrold's comments on Star Trek have been totally borne out while Asimov's work on robots has (as far as I can tell) faded into irrelevance.
I may be wrong, since I'm not all that versed in his stuff, so it may resonate more that I know. But I don't see his stamp in, say, Terminator or The Matrix, two of the heavies in robot-related narrative.
I almost pointed that out. I think Asmov's whole presumed infallibility and importance on anything having to do with Robot issue is complete nonsense.
Somehow his "Laws of Robotics" (which are nothing more than an arbitrary plot device invented by him to govern the robots in his short stories) became universally misunderstood to be some kind of inviolate "real" laws governing any robots, anywhere; you can't break them, and if you write a story in which a robot breaks them, supposedly there's something wrong with your story.
It's absolutely ridiculous; last I heard a robot, fictional or otherwise, is free to do whatever it was built to do (including firing armaments at humans) and there is no "Law" whatsoever preventing it. It's all just hype.
But I didn't want to interrupt the flow of what I was writing, so I just left it alone. For the purpose of Gerrold's excellent point, I just let it stand.
Post a Comment