First rule of Horrorthon is: watch horror movies. Second rule of Horrorthon is: write about it. Warn us. Tempt us. The one who watches the most movies in 31 days wins. There is no prize.
Thursday, January 25, 2007
So will there be a Spidy 4?
From Moviesonline, "From the birth of the first film, the word trilogy has defined the biggest and best superhero movie franchise today; "Spider-Man." Plenty of superhero movies have done it or are doing it lately, like "X-Men," "Fantastic Four," and the new "Batman" films. Three is a good number, but four is the number of yesterday’s superhero franchises, like "Superman" and the old "Batman" films. Those were the big greats, the flagship characters of DC Comics that led it’s universe to silver screen greatness.
So why shouldn’t Spidey follow suit? Can’t he have a quadrilogy too? After all, he’s Marvel’s greatest pioneer, peaking their success after "Blade" and "X-Men" helped Marvel raise the bar, and then Spidey took it higher than ever before. According to SuperHeroHype, Sony Pictures is so excited about "Spider-Man 3," the supposed end of the trilogy (hence the word trilogy) and the studio is so happy with the extraordinary response to screening footage that they are talking "Spider-Man 4." Apparently, the fourth film is confirmed as going into development.
Who did not see this coming? And, who wouldn’t want to see it happen? These are the reasons that the studio has allegedly begun talks with David Koepp to pen "Spider-Man 4" to officially make a quadrilogy out of the biggest big screen superhero franchise to date. has more than earned his shot at a fourth movie, especially having earned an estimate of $1.6 billion worldwide between the first two movies. "Spider-Man" raked in the box office dough at $403 million domestic gross, and "Spider-Man 2" raked in just slightly less at $373 million domestic.
But, here’s the billion dollar question; will Tobey Maguire be back? As early as "Spider-Man 2" there was talk that Maguire was losing interest and motivation to continue with the trilogy. Now, with talks of a fourth movie, when he and other cast members have spoken about being done with "Spider-Man" after "Spider-Man 3," where does that leave number four? The possibility of losing Maguire already caused an uproar when he wasn’t sure he would continue with the role. Rumors flew long ago that Jake Gyllenhaal might replace Maguire as the webcrawler, but now any replacement would seem twice as misplaced and disappointing. If Sony wants to do "Spidey 4," all I can say is that I hope they have all the right people back on board, or else a mighty ship could sink awfully fast."
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Salem's Lot 1979 and Salem's Lot 2024
Happy Halloween everybody! Julie's working late and the boy doesn't have school tomorrow so he's heading to one of those crazy f...
-
(2007) * First of all let me say that as far as I could tell there are absolutely no dead teenagers in this entire film. Every year just ...
4 comments:
Hmmm...actually, the idea of a Spidey movie with Jake Gyllenhaal is really appealing. Why not switch it up? It would be like the Bond franchise on a faster schedule.
And while you're at it, let's get a new Mary Jane, too (And I say this as a Dunst fan).
And when they're done with that they can do Superman again starring the guy who plays Anders on Battlestar Galactica as Superman and Parker Posey as Lois Lane.
Yeah, I couldn't care less if Toby is replaced and unlike Octo, I don't like snaggletooth, I mean K.D. at all and would love to see someone else in the role.
While we're at it, how about getting rid of the whole Superkid angle in Superman?
And what about Scarecrow's brain?
Post a Comment