From WWTDD, The snooty London Times had an article with 18-year-old Emma Watson in their Sunday edition, and even though most of it is a bunch of faggity yacht-club nonsense about university and helping others, they finally get down to business and ask when we'll get to see her naked.
So in 20 years’ time, I can quite easily see her being a brilliant lawyer or civil servant — in a good way, of course — and perhaps she sees it too. “I have enough to hold me together without fame,” she says. “I have a really supportive family and a full life away from Harry Potter. It’s unlikely that I’ll be part of anything this big ever again, so I need to deal with that. I’m not going to take a job just because, shit, I’m not doing anything else.” She still loves acting, naturally — she would even, steady chaps, go nude. “Yes,” she says. “For Bernardo Bertolucci. It . . . depends. I’m not getting my kit off any time soon, but it is part of my job.”
I get the feeling her body isn’t so great (great = skinny with big tits) so the only way this would be rewarding is if she got naked as Hermione. I don’t know why Bertlucci would make a movie about that, or who Bertolucci is, but people can be surprisingly motivated when the poison starts to kick in.
1 comment:
It must be nice to be getting up in years and reading in some newspaper about some just-legal starlet who would take her clothes off in front of you. That's probably what Woody Allen's life is like -- or would be, if he ever shot nude scenes.
Bertolucci, we're counting on you, man.
Post a Comment