Thursday, August 24, 2006

Astronomers say Pluto is not a planet, Pluto pissed


PRAGUE, Czech Republic (AP) — Leading astronomers declared Thursday that Pluto is no longer a planet under historic new guidelines that downsize the solar system from nine planets to eight.
After a tumultuous week of clashing over the essence of the cosmos, the International Astronomical Union stripped Pluto of the planetary status it has held since its discovery in 1930. The new definition of what is — and isn't — a planet fills a centuries-old black hole for scientists who have labored since Copernicus without one.

Although astronomers applauded after the vote, Jocelyn Bell Burnell — a specialist in neutron stars from Northern Ireland who oversaw the proceedings — urged those who might be "quite disappointed" to look on the bright side.

"It could be argued that we are creating an umbrella called 'planet' under which the dwarf planets exist," she said, drawing laughter by waving a stuffed Pluto of Walt Disney fame beneath a real umbrella.

The decision by the prestigious international group spells out the basic tests that celestial objects will have to meet before they can be considered for admission to the elite cosmic club.

For now, membership will be restricted to the eight "classical" planets in the solar system: Mercury, Venus, Earth, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus and Neptune.

Much-maligned Pluto doesn't make the grade under the new rules for a planet: "a celestial body that is in orbit around the sun, has sufficient mass for its self-gravity to overcome rigid body forces so that it assumes a ... nearly round shape, and has cleared the neighborhood around its orbit."

Pluto is automatically disqualified because its oblong orbit overlaps with Neptune's.

Instead, it will be reclassified in a new category of "dwarf planets," similar to what long have been termed "minor planets." The definition also lays out a third class of lesser objects that orbit the sun — "small solar system bodies," a term that will apply to numerous asteroids, comets and other natural satellites.

It was unclear how Pluto's demotion might affect the mission of NASA's New Horizons spacecraft, which earlier this year began a 9½-year journey to the oddball object to unearth more of its secrets.

The decision at a conference of 2,500 astronomers from 75 countries was a dramatic shift from just a week ago, when the group's leaders floated a proposal that would have reaffirmed Pluto's planetary status and made planets of its largest moon and two other objects.

That plan proved highly unpopular, splitting astronomers into factions and triggering days of sometimes combative debate that led to Pluto's undoing.

Now, two of the objects that at one point were cruising toward possible full-fledged planethood will join Pluto as dwarfs: the asteroid Ceres, which was a planet in the 1800s before it got demoted, and 2003 UB313, an icy object slightly larger than Pluto whose discoverer, Michael Brown of the California Institute of Technology, has nicknamed Xena.

Charon, the largest of Pluto's three moons, is no longer under consideration for any special designation.

9 comments:

JPX said...

"guidelines that downsize the solar system from nine planets to eight." Yeah because we're running out of room up there.

Octopunk said...

This was the first article I read on the BBC today before I even checked out the blog; I was going to post something myself. I'm so indignant about this. Now that our solar system's been knocked down to nine planets, only people from the trashier solar systems are going to hang out with us.

And I'll be saying "I told you so" when the Plutonians are swarming over Prague brandishing their freeze rays.

Anonymous said...

Octo, we're settling that in the big battle behind the moon right now. You don't follow politics enough damn it

Anonymous said...

Jordan Likes 'Silent Hill'

Yes, that's what the Horrorthon posting title would be, if I had the power to post on Horrorthon. Instead I'm shamelessly piggybacking my remark right here. I'm not even scrolling down to yesterday's "List of Games into Movies" post, although that would be more appropriate, because this way you guys are more likely to see what I wrote.

So, what did you guys think anyway? I'm not the connoisseur you guys are, but I thought it was great. Of course I wasn't expecting much beyond a minimal, game-armature plot and a lot of terrifying visuals, and I got all that plus a rather fanciful notion of what West Virginia motorcycle cops look like.

"The guy with a cash register for a head" (as one of the reviewers called him) is pretty scary. And the Borg Queen gives a great creepy peformance. Of the three layers of reality, the one in the middle (ash, stores etc.) is my favorite.

What do YOU think etc.

Johnny Sweatpants said...

Give the man posting privileges dammit!

Octopunk said...

Yo, I sent you an invite months ago. Did you not get it?

JPX said...

Liked the look of Silent Hill a lot. The film made no sense, however. I've never played the game so perhaps that's why I was at a loss. The guy with a cash register for a head was fantastic, but underused. What the hell was that movie about?

Octopunk said...

The evils of coal mining.

Anonymous said...

Some premise overload; too many explanations, etc.

Basically the place (and therefore the movie) is a game, by which I mean, learn the rules and you can make it through.

Malevolent

 2018  ***1/2 It's 1986 for some reason, and a team of paranormal investigators are making a big name for themselves all over Scotland. ...