First rule of Horrorthon is: watch horror movies. Second rule of Horrorthon is: write about it. Warn us. Tempt us. The one who watches the most movies in 31 days wins. There is no prize.
Wednesday, October 14, 2009
Trick 'r Treat
(2008) ***
When in Rome...
This isn't really my cup of tea, but it definitely delivers the goods, and I have to give the movie full credit for achieving exactly what it sets out to do, and then some. I had a great time, and I admire the intentions and the technique, but I can't take it all that seriously (nor are we really meant to).
Trick 'r Treat employs the old-fashioned "Tales From the Crypt" anthology template -- simplified horror anecdotes, structured like jokes with nasty punchlines -- fused with a post-Tarantino multithreaded story structure. The result is like Creepshow (1982) pureed in a blender, with better actors and better effects. Bits and pieces (sometimes literally) of each story appear in the others, magnifying the shock effects while amping up the suspense.
The stories themselves are reasonably heavy-duty fare -- i.e. conceptually full-fledged horror material -- but the movie maintains a cumulative light-hearted tone that upholds the excellent E.C. Comics tradition that Rod Serling and others have been re-working for decades, and the darker story elements are gift-wrapped with enough wit and speed that they don't weigh down the proceedings. This hybrid presentational style, in which genuine shocks are interspersed with wonderfully dry witicisms and fake-outs, is Trick 'r Treat's real achievement, and credit is due to writer/director Michael Doherty (Bryan Singer's writer on X2 and Superman Returns) (ugh) for keeping the action moving and the scares coming, and, most important, maintaining the proper screwball tone, in which campfire-story adrenaline rushes, jolts of real fear and hysterical laughter are blended like a fine cocktail.
The great thing is, Halloween itself is a nutty holiday anyway, with innocent children indulging in the macabre (although real Halloween festivities are considerably less ritualized and superstitious that what's shown here). Trick 'r Treat understands that we want to be scared, but we also want to be safe; to laugh off the fear -- and that the implicit contradiction can get us into trouble psychologically even if there is no real danger. (This movie's fantasy version of Halloween night, in which death really is around every corner, emphasizes this basic human schizophrenia wonderfully.) I'm sure I've seen dozens of movies in which a genuinely grisly threat is misunderstood to be part of a Halloween celebration, and dozens more in which the Halloween trappings provide scary atmosphere for a genuine horror story, but I don't think I've ever seen a movie run through so many dizzying variations on these ideas, so adroitly and effectively. Again, the tone is the key: during the most suspenseful sequences, the awareness that the movie has playful intentions -- is trying to mess with you -- amplifies the fear wonderfully. (I had particular trouble sitting through the business with the kids exploring the quarry floor where the mythical school bus was lost; the scenario would be frightening in any movie, but in this one, where you have no idea what's coming, it was nearly unbearable.)
A-list Hollywood character actors like Anna Paquin, Brian Cox and Dylan Baker bring their charisma and skills to bear, here, but don't give Trick 'r Treat the kind of gravitas they're known for. Which is fine, because Trick 'r Treat doesn't need gravitas (and, as I wrote up top, this isn't my cup of tea, and that's probably why; I'm addicted to gravitas). The baroque, comic-book craziness -- the certainty that anything can happen, and probably will -- is the secret to this movie's success. Legitimately scary as hell, without the calories.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Salem's Lot 1979 and Salem's Lot 2024
Happy Halloween everybody! Julie's working late and the boy doesn't have school tomorrow so he's heading to one of those crazy f...
-
(2007) * First of all let me say that as far as I could tell there are absolutely no dead teenagers in this entire film. Every year just ...
12 comments:
"I had particular trouble sitting through the business with the kids exploring the quarry floor where the mythical school bus was lost; the scenario would be frightening in any movie, but in this one, where you have no idea what's coming, it was nearly unbearable." Me too! This was the one sequence in the film that gave me the heebie-jeebies. The creepy elevator cage set the tone for me - who would get in that thing? Even on a bright, sunny day that would be an unnerving ride. I'm so glad you checked this out, Jordan!
Great review Jordan. You mentioned Tales from the Crypt and it's funny the whole time I was watching the film I was thinking Creepshow which essentially is the same thing.
Excellent review! It's fun seeing so many different takes on this one movie.
When in Rome, indeed! Nice work. I particularly liked this: "This movie's fantasy version of Halloween night, in which death really is around every corner, emphasizes this basic human schizophrenia wonderfully."
Two things occur to me: The episodic experience this movie reminded me of the most was Tales From The Darkside, although that's mainly because there's a TftD episode that is very similar to the Brian Cox storyline. The main difference between this flick and Darkside is TrT doesn't come with that feeling of disppointment at the end of each story.
The other thing is: I'm so glad this movie doesn't lather on the "we're in a comic book!" format like Creepshow does. I love the EC vibe, but I don't need panels in my movie.
The vignette with the kids is easily my favorite. I like how in horror films too, kids, age 8-13 are so precocious, yet kids age 14-19 are horny, drugged out degenerates just waiting to be victims.
Fun review, Jordan. It actually reads more like a **** review, so maybe you liked its lack of gravitas in spite of yourself.
No, it really does lose a star for not being a "serious" movie; a "real" movie. That's just how I roll.
Quarantine and The Strangers (and the Hostel duology) are four-star movies because I don't have to be immersed in the Horrorthon sensibility to dig them. I'm not harshing on Trick 'r Treat; for example, there isn't a single Star Trek movie I would regard as being up to the standards of "actual" cinema except for the most recent, and yet I love them all. I just can't, again, take them seriously.
I gave five stars each to my "masterpiece series" two years ago (Alien, Psycho, The Exorcist, Night of the Living Dead etc.) I've got one or two five-star movies up my sleeve this year. I wonder what they are? :)
I just watched the first third of The Strangers again, by the way. Damn, that's a fine film! And scary.
Don't get me wrong: I totally dug this flick. I'm just (as octopunk will tell you, and as my pompous, overbearing writing style reveals) a very, very serious person.
Totally agree about the panels Octo, I was glad they didn't do it either.
I'm happy to hear that The Strangers is fun. I grabbed it in a big stack last night from the library. A few folks reviewed it last year favorably as well.
Landshark, read my The Strangers review! It's got gravitas.
(retreats, mulling over weighty matters)
Post a Comment